Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Header Question

  1. #1
    Inactive Member kennethhoffpauir's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 9th, 2000
    Posts
    12
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Which header would be better for a SC engine, a 4-2-1 one piece or a 4-1 header? I've heard that a 4-2-1 is better, but I want to hear other opinions or see other members HP numbers.

  2. #2
    Inactive Member sjoback's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 5th, 1999
    Posts
    503
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    4-2-1 better for relatively stock setup (6-8psi with VTEC intact).

    Kamikaze 4-1 or Hi-Tech 4-1 better for non-vtec high boost applications.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member lundgren's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 16th, 1999
    Posts
    1,436
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    It depends on the model. I think the 4 headers of choice are the DC 4-2-1, Kamakazi, Hi-Tech (Expensive), or the JDM Type R 4-1.

    Short larger primaries are important.

    ------------------
    http://www.netbsi-kc.com/integra/
    http://www.netbsi-kc.com/aa/
    http://www.groupbuycenter.com/

  4. #4
    Inactive Member FoxRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 2nd, 1999
    Posts
    247
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I speak from experince.

    Avoid the DC Sports 4-1 header on a blown application like the plauge. You will be underwhelmed at the low-end performance of it. I'm about to swap back to the stock manifold.

    Sean


    ------------------
    - Atomic 'Teg -
    Blown '99 Milano Red GSR, IceMan CAI
    DC Sports 4-1 Header, ES torque mounts

  5. #5
    Inactive Member fastfour's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 27th, 1999
    Posts
    709
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Question

    FoxRocket,

    Do you have dyno results on this or is this just how it feels? I picked one up for the use of the higher rpm horsepower thinking low end is not needed with the charger as much.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member SSBP's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 15th, 1999
    Posts
    222
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I have dyno results from the DC 4-1. I gained 8 H.P. and 2 Torque. Check it out at the Integra Dyno Center.

    I say try extrude honing the stock manifold.

  7. #7
    Inactive Member kennethhoffpauir's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 9th, 2000
    Posts
    12
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Does any one have the results from a 4-2-1?

  8. #8
    Inactive Member SSBP's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 15th, 1999
    Posts
    222
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    NOBODY has legimate real world dyno results unless they are talking about the butt dyno.

    ------------------
    00 Naples Gold 3.2TL

  9. #9
    Inactive Member FoxRocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 2nd, 1999
    Posts
    247
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    True, I don't have a dyno plot of the performance I am getting from the 4-1. In every day driving the car didn't take hills nearly as well as it used to when I had the stock manifold installed. On the 73 south to San Diego is where I became disappointed with the 4-1, higher revs to go 70 up the hill with the 4-1 than with the stock manifold. (I drive that route about every other day)

    SSBP, where on your dyno graph are those 8hp and 2lb/ft at? Is an across the board improvement? I ask this because I can only really feel a difference between the stock manfold and the 4-1 above 5000RPM. My earlier post was a bit if an over-reaction.

    FastFour...It would depend on what you want from you car. If you're into dragging then the 4-1 is probably a good bet. If you like AutoX/Street performance I don't think the 4-1 is such a good choice.

    Sean

    ------------------
    - Atomic 'Teg -
    Blown '99 Milano Red GSR, IceMan CAI
    DC Sports 4-1 Header, ES torque mounts

    [This message has been edited by FoxRocket (edited July 06, 2000).]

  10. #10
    Inactive Member strng1dah's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 21st, 1999
    Posts
    275
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    FOX Theyre on the integra dyno center

    ------------------
    2000 GSR

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •